:: Graffiti on Kings Mountain Road which is between Woodside and highway 35 and unicycles descending - such skill ::
Click on photograph to enlarge. To go to the next photograph, go to the top right and click on Next.
Please leave a comment. The more comments, the more likely that this graffiti will be flagged as a problem that needs to be fixed.
This graffiti needs to be cleaned up completley restoring signs to original conditions. Painting over the top of graffiti does not appear to work. Letting the graffiti remain ligitimizes these written sentiments.
The photographs of graffiti are grouped by:
- on road surface
- signs defaced
- signs with poop. Fixation?
- signs that have been spray painted over graffiti
- signs that have been spray painted over graffiti and then written on
- unicycles
:: Is the FAA following their published take off procedures for SSTIK and CNDEL? ::
52% of time for SSTIK and 10% of flights for CNDEL. Why?
Until we understand why the FAA is not following their written departure procedures, it is hard to comment as to where the waypoints should be moved. Currently the CNDEL waypoint seems to be ignored.
We do know that having planes fly further away is better. Higher over Brisbane does not work as there are limits as to how quickly the planes can ascend and does not mitigate against health concerns from the pollution. An extra 500 foot makes scarcely any difference to noise or pollution. And Santa Cruz is up in arms about the noise of planes that are twice as high as the current ones over Brisbane and they are descending. To reduce the noise and health concerns, the planes need to be further away.
The FAA tells us that the SSTIK flights are being vectored due to safety and separation concerns about flights from Oakland. If the CNDEL flights were to fly the published procedure, would the SSTIK flights need to be vectored?
:: SSTIK flights over Brisbane ::
Note the path over Brisbane. The FAA computer models say that there will be no increase in noise. Can the SFO Round Table get from the FAA where the flights will pass over the ground? We do not want consultants' interpretation of where they think the flights will go. Or flight tracks for the whole day ie not cherry picked.
The FAA has cherry picked results in the past and presented at the SFO Round Table meeting to show that 100% of the flights that were vectored, were due to conflicts with flights from Oakland. We now have multiple videos that show the vectoring over Brisbane is not due to conflicts ie more than 5 minutes to a flight taking off from Oakland. Habit or lack of coordination with the Oakland and SFO Towers or both?
:: Analysis of aircraft noise events measured at Brisbane Noise monitor ::
:: Screen shots of Flights over Brisbane on 1/11/2015. Click on image to enlarge ::
:: Assumptions for SSTIK V actual flight paths in August 2015 ::
:: 15th_anniversary ::
Sisters 15th anniversary and parents make an appearance
:: The sisters at Christmas 2016 ::
:: Questions for Speier meeting and further information ::
:: Sharon's photograph album ::
:: Backroads photographs summer 2014. Click on image to enlarge ::
